Showing posts with label Human Dignity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Human Dignity. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

Senator Santorum Wins Big - Then another Stumper

By the time most of you read this you will know that Senator Santorum, my favorite Republican presidential candidate, won two and maybe three of today's caucus states. I just listened to his victory speech and he again restated his belief that the government created our right  to health care and even claims that President Obama agrees with him! If he is right then President Obama is in fact well to the right of the Senator on this issue (which I suspect is the case).

See my research and reading on Senator's position on human rights in the previous posting. I have probably bored you with the story of the courting I received from Republicans following my departure from the Democratic party in the early 1990s. The first issue relates to abortion and the fact that most republicans that approached me were pro abortion. The second most impressive position came from Republicans that claimed to be 'conservative' and their marketing talking point was that government created rights. Sometimes it was couched in terms a strange 'American Exceptionalism' that says that only Americans have human rights because only the America's government has created them.

I think I was always classified as a liberal because I believed that human rights accrue to all human person because they are human and I adhere to a matching religious world view that human are 'endowed by their creator' with such rights. Thus as in the first issue I found it incompatible with my liberal ideals to join with a party that argues against the idea of inherent  or as our founders said, unalienable Rights that preceded any action by government.

Now Senator Santorum did allude to the Declaration and did state that he believes that human rights are from God, a view I share, but then makes a case by attacking the health care reform that we humans in fact have no right to health care. POW! Take that you poor people, here, one more for all the former middle class who who have been denied or lost their health insurance. I suspect that he is only the most articulate of the field which probably holds the same view.

The strangest aspect of the argument he made is that President Obama agrees  with him about creating a right which has the effect of placing the President in a more 'conservative' position than Rick himself since he believes that rights are God given, a clearly more liberal view in my experience. In addition I  suspect his 'conservatism' bars believing in the the phase,  "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."  from the founding document.

If you are getting the idea that I'm really not impressed by the fuzz generated by our politicians this week (read  my last several political postings critical of both Republican and Democratic candidates) you got it right.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Arriving by the back door - What we have in common with todays Illegals

Years ago I heard Cherish-The-Ladies sing this song in a small rural church in New Jersey. While it is a lament of the "illegals" of an earlier generation it is also a tribute to those of our ancestors who arrived the same way. Please keep today's immigrants in your prayers. They are highly cherished children of our God.




You can check out Cherish The Ladies by clicking here.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Political Scare Tactics Violate Human Dignity

Sarah Palin[1] and others have referred to a section of one of the Bills in the House of Representatives (HR3200-1233) as justification for their claim that Congress intends to enact “Death Panels” as a way to frighten us senior citizens. Please find below, verbatim, the defining text from this section. You will note that the “death panel” that Mrs. Palin sees here is made up of your family and your doctor!

Defining Texts from HR3200 Section 1233:

“The term ‘advance care planning consultation’ means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following:

(A) An explanation by the practitioner of advance care planning, including
key questions and considerations, important steps, and suggested people to talk to.

(B) An explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills
and durable powers of attorney, and their uses.

(C)An explanation by the practitioner of the role and responsibilities of a health care proxy.

(D)The provision by the practitioner of a list of national and State-specific resources
to assist consumers and their families with advance care planning, including the
national toll-free hotline, the advance care planning clearinghouses, and State legal
service organizations (including those funded through
the Older Americans Act of 1965).

(E) An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services
and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits
for such services and supports that are available under this title.”

Subsection (F) provides that your practitioner answer all your questions including those about the rules and requirements of your state of residence. Then in paragraph (2) the term “practitioner is defined.

“ A practitioner described in this paragraph is—

(A) a physician ---

(B) a nurse practitioner or physician’s assistant who has
he authority under State law to sign orders for life sustaining treatments.”


This law does not create these consultations! Many of us have had these discussions with our family and our doctor. Many of us have served as healthcare proxies for our loved ones and many have created healthcare directives to be sure that our end of life healthy care conforms to our moral and spiritual desires.

This law does, however, make these consultations an item covered by medicare. Those politician that characterize this fact as “a government death panel” or a “requirement that seniors be euthanized” reveal their gross disrespect for us seniors through their lie. Their willingness to terrorize[2] seniors leads me to ask who they are really serving if not us?
--------------------------------------------------
[1] Americans United For Life Web Site - http://blog.aul.org/2009/08/13/whats-missing-from-the-white-houses-reality-check/

[2] Merriam Webster :
Main Entry: ter·ror·ize - Pronunciation: \ˈter-ər-ˌīz\ - Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): ter·ror·ized; ter·ror·iz·ing, Date: 1823
1: to fill with terror or anxiety : scare
2 : to coerce by threat or violence
— ter·ror·i·za·tion \ˌter-ər-ə-ˈzā-shən\ noun